Standing ready to help you through the legal maze

Ms. Audrey is a dedicated and accomplished legal professional who graduated from Singapore Management University in 2019. She was admitted to the Singapore Bar as an Advocate and Solicitor in August 2020, marking the start of her promising legal career.

Audrey has extensive experience in dispute resolution, handling a broad spectrum of cases, including commercial and contractual disputes, employment conflicts, rental and tenancy issues, personal torts, and personal injury claims. She prioritizes cost-effective and practical solutions, frequently advising clients on negotiation and mediation to achieve favourable outcomes while minimizing the financial and emotional toll of litigation.

Beyond her dispute resolution expertise, Audrey is also experienced in handling both uncontested and contested divorce proceedings. Recognizing the emotional challenges of divorce, she takes a client-centric approach, offering step-by-step guidance to help individuals make informed decisions. Notably, she recently mediated a multi-million-dollar divorce settlement, securing a mutually satisfactory resolution without prolonged court battles.

Audrey is also well-versed in criminal law and has defended clients across a broad spectrum of criminal matters. Her experience spans minor offences, such as traffic violations, to more serious crimes, including violent offences, illegal moneylending activities, and white-collar crimes. Additionally, she has handled cases related to immigration violations, such as overstaying offences. Audrey’s legal acumen and meticulous case preparation have contributed to favourable outcomes for her clients, reinforcing her reputation as a skilled criminal defence lawyer.

One of Audrey’s most notable cases involved representing buyers accused of evading stamp duties, a landmark case in Singapore’s legal history. As the first of its kind, it set a precedent in the country’s legal landscape. Audrey’s expertise was instrumental in navigating the complexities of tax and property law, ensuring her clients were well-represented in this high-profile matter.

In addition to her litigation and dispute resolution experience, Audrey is highly proficient in preparing comprehensive due diligence reports for foreign companies seeking to enter or operate within the Singapore market. Her meticulous research and attention to detail provide clients with a clear understanding of the legal and regulatory framework before making critical business decisions. Audrey has recently assisted in the successful outcome of a case involving a suit against a financial institution for negligence and recovering the losses by way of mediation.

Audrey also provides legal advice and opinions to foreign corporations, particularly those from China. She assists these companies in understanding Singapore’s businesslaws, regulatory compliance, and contractual obligations, enabling them to make informed and strategic business moves. Her ability to bridge cross-border legal and cultural differences makes her an invaluable resource for foreign clients navigating the complexities of Singaporean law.

Audrey’s legal proficiency, dedication to justice, and ability to navigate intricate legal matters make her an invaluable asset to the legal fraternity. Whether representing clients in dispute resolution in commercial matters, family law matters, or criminal cases, she remains steadfast in her commitment to delivering tailored legal solutions that protect her clients’ rights and interests. With a keen eye for detail, strategic legal thinking, and a compassionate approach, Audrey continues to be a trusted advisor and advocate for individuals facing legal challenges.

Other notable criminal cases include:

Public Prosecutor v Goh Tian Lee (Fraud Claims)

Public Prosecutor v Long Shiquan Joshua (Criminal Breach of Trust)

Public Prosecutor v Hany Aboubakr Abdelkarim Abdelfattah (Abuse)

Public Prosecutor v Haslinda Binte Ismail (Abuse)

Public Prosecutor v Abdul Rahman Milatu (Causing Hurt due to Rash Act)

Public Prosecutor v (redacted) (Sexual Harassment At Workplaces)

Public Prosecutor v Rahiman Rahim (Assault)

Stamp Duties Act – First Prosecution of its kind. Co-accused persons represented by SC Murali Pillai from Rajah and Tann and Dennis Tan from Circular Law (Stamp Duties Act)

Public Prosecutor v Derek Tay Zhi Cong (Mandatory Treatment Order)

Public Prosecutor v CBT (Rape)

Public Prosecutor v Johanizam Johari (Possessing an Offensive Weapon)

Public Prosecutor v Chuah Seng Chu (Substantially Contributing To The Risk Of A Fire Through A Negligent Act)

Public Prosecutor v Zhao Lin (Assault Against Domestic Worker)

Public Prosecutor v Wee Yap Kwang (Illegal Betting)

Public Prosecutor v Muhammad Fiqkri Jaffri (Voluntarily Causing Grievous Hurt To A Public Servant)

Public Prosecutor v Leong Jun Xian (Money Laundering)

Public Prosecutor v Yeoh Keng Swee (Forgery For The Purpose Of Cheating)

Public Prosecutor v Alvin Seah (Harassment, Unlawful Stalking, Using Abusive Words Against A Public Servant)

Public Prosecutor v Guo Lili (Providing False Information To A Police Officer, Knowing That It Would Lead To Investigations Against Her Landlord For An Offence Of Rape)

Public Prosecutor v Tan Han Chek (Voyeurism)